晚清学者郭麐携其子郭续大编撰的《潍县方言》《潍言》两种方言类著述，皆未定稿刊行，因二书题名、内容、体例等极为相似，后世著录多有混同，同时还出现了《潍方言》《潍语》的书名著录，遂使学界对郭麐方言类著述认识模糊不清，产生讹误。文章对《潍县方言》《潍言》的版本、体例、内容等作了梳理、廓清。结论为《潍言》是《潍县方言》的整理本，《潍县志稿·艺文志》《双行精舍书跋辑存续编》著录的《潍方言》是《潍县方言》,《双行精舍书跋辑存》著录的《潍语》一书并不存在。

The two dialectal works compiled by the late Qing scholar Guo Lin and his son Guo Xuda, namely “Weixian Dialect” and “Wei Vernacular”, were never finalized and published. Due to their extremely similar titles, contents, and styles, later bibliographic records often confused them. Moreover, there were also records of the titles “Wei Dialect” and “Wei Yu”, which further led to confusion and errors in the academic community's understanding of Guo Lin's dialectal works. This paper sorts out and clarifies the versions, styles, and contents of “Weixian Dialect” and “Wei Vernacular”. The conclusion of this paper is that “Wei Vernacular” is the revised version of “Weixian Dialect”, and the “Wei Dialect” recorded in“Waixian Zhigao-Yiwenzhi”and “Shuangxing Vihara: Collection of Postscripts to Books(Continued Edition)”is actually “Weixian Dialect”. The “Wei Yu” recorded in “Shuangxing Vihara: Collected Postscripts to Books” does not exist.